检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王仁富[1,2]
机构地区:[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093 [2]上海电力学院经管学院,上海200090
出 处:《华东理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第2期79-85,共7页Journal of East China University of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
基 金:中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20110491371);上海市教委科研创新项目(13YS094)
摘 要:股东大会决议的合法性和正当性是认定决议是否有效的关键要素,而决议的合法性有赖于作为公司组织体成员的股东对股东大会决议过程的参与,决议的正当性也须建立在参与决议过程的股东充分行使程序性权利的基础上。可见,程序是股东大会决议效力问题的关键和核心。然而,现行《公司法》有关股东大会决议形成中程序性权利的规定存在诸多缺陷,影响了决议的效力以及由决议而生的公司法律关系的安定性,因此,需要对以表决权为核心的程序性权利的行使提供更完善的制度保障。Legality and legitimacy are the key elements of identifying the validity of shareholders' meeting resolution, but the legality of the resolution depends on the participation of shareholders in the process, and the legitimacy of the resolution should be set up on the basis of exercising the shareholder' procedural rights to participate in the procedure fully. Obviously, program is the key and core of the problem on the validity of the resolution. However, there are many defects on the provisions of the procedural rights in the existing Company Law, affecting the effectiveness of the resolution as well as the stability of legal relationship from the resolution. Therefore, it's necessary to perfect system to protect the procedural rights of which voting right are the core.
分 类 号:D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.45