检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:荀细辉[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省深圳市第二人民医院呼吸科,518000
出 处:《护理实践与研究》2013年第11期25-26,共2页Nursing Practice and Research
摘 要:目的:探讨出院计划服务模式应用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的临床效果。方法:选取我院2010年1月~2012年6月收治的120例慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者随机分为观察组及对照组各60例,对照组采用中药方进行治疗并配合常规性护理,观察组在此基础上配合出院计划服务护理模式,并在干预前及出院时对两组患者进行自我效能评分。结果:两组患者临床显效率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),观察组患者采用出院计划服务干预后自我效能总分、体力活动、情感波动以及环境适应等方面评分均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对COPD患者采用出院计划服务干预,能有效提高患者自我效能,从而改善患者体力活动、情感波动以及对环境的适应能力,有利于患者及早康复。Objective: to disehm'ge planning service mode for COPD ( chronic obstructive pneumonia ) patients in the clinical effect analysis and discus- sion. Methods:Chose our hospital from January 2010 to June 2012 treated 120 eases of COPD patients as the object of study,the patients were randomly di- vided into the observation group and the control group with 60 cases in each group,the control group was treated with Chinese traditional medicine treatment and side with routine nursing,the patients in observation group on the basis of diseharge planning services nursing mode,and beforo intervention and at dis- charge of patients in two groups compared self- e^cacy score. Results :The two groups of patients with clinical significant efficiency was no statistical differ- ence (P 〉 0. 0S), patients in the observation group adopted intervention plan services after discharge self- efficacy, physical activity, emotional fluctua- tions and environmental adaptation,scores were higher than those in the control group, the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈0.05). Conclusion: The COPD patients using discharge planning intervention can effectively improve patients' self-efficacy,thereby improving patient physical activity,emo- tional fluctuations and the ability to adapt to the environment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15