检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴齐[1] 曹长琦[1] 李士杰[1] 闫炎[1] 李香菊[2] 阎石[3] 吴楠[3] 张集昌[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所,恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室内镜中心,北京100142 [2]北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所,恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室病理科,北京100142 [3]北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所,恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室胸外二科,北京100142
出 处:《北京大学学报(医学版)》2013年第3期464-468,共5页Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences
摘 要:目的:比较超声内镜引导下经支气管针吸活检(endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspi-ration,EBUS-TBNA)和经支气管针吸活检(transbronchial needle aspiration,TBNA)对肺与纵隔病变的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2011年5月接受EBUS-TBNA或TBNA检查的100例患者(EBUS-TBNA 50例,TBNA50例)的临床资料,总结穿刺结果和并发症发生率。结果:100例患者共穿刺121个部位,EBUS-TBNA组和TBNA组获得满意标本的比例分别为90.6%和78.9%。两组的诊断准确率分别为90.0%和72.0%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.022);严重并发症发生率均为0。结论:EBUS-TBNA与TBNA相比敏感性、特异性、诊断准确率更高,且不增加操作相关并发症,对肺与纵隔病变的诊断更有优势。Objective: To compare the values of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and TBNA for the diagnosis of hilar and mediastinal lesions. Methods:The clinical data of 100 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA (n = 50) and TBNA (n = 50) between January 2010 and May 2011 were retrospectively reviewed, and the results and complications were recorded. Results:A total of 121 lesions in the 100 patients were evaluated, the sample yeilds of EBUS-TBNA and TBNA were 90.6% and 78.9% and the diagnostic accuracy rates in the two groups were 90.0% and 72.0% (P = 0. 022) , respectively. No major complications happened. The sensitivity, specificity and accuarcy of EBUS-TBNA were higher and the complication rate was not increased as compared with TBNA. Conclusion: EBUS-TBNA has a higher diagnostic yield for the evaluation of hilar and mediastinal lesions.
关 键 词:腔内超声检查 支气管镜检查 活组织检查 针吸 肺肿瘤
分 类 号:R445[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15