检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省深圳大学法学院,中国518060 [2]广东省深圳大学师范学院
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2013年第6期943-945,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的考察特质应对方式对老年人主观幸福感的影响及其机制。方法采用总体幸福感量表(GWB)和特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)对深圳市及周边地区共116名退休老年人进行调查。结果老年人的主观幸福感和应对方式都处于中等偏高水平,特质应对方式与主观幸福感显著相关并有显著预测作用(r=0.570,P<0.01)。结论老年人特质应对方式的不同对主观幸福感总体及各层面的预测作用不同,采取积极应对方式者可能比采取消极应对方式者产生更强的幸福感。Objective To explore the influence mechanism of coping style on subjective well-being of the elderly.Methods A total of 116 retired elderly were evaluated with the general well-being schedule(GWB)and Trait Coping Styles Questionnaire(TCSQ)in Shenzhen city and the surrounding areas.Results The SWB and coping style of the elderly were above the niddle level.SWB had positively correlated to positive coping while negatively to negative coping.Stepwise regression analysis indicated trait coping style had significant influence on SWB(r=0.570,P0.01).Conclusion The elderly with different trait coping style have different subjective well-being,the elderly taking positive coping style may produce more happiness than those resorting to negative coping style.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63