检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范书霞[1] 韩战营[1] 邱春光[1] 陈晓杰[1] 卢文杰[1]
机构地区:[1]郑州大学第一附属医院心血管内科,河南郑州450052
出 处:《河南医学研究》2013年第3期324-326,共3页Henan Medical Research
摘 要:目的:探讨糖尿病对心肌血流储备分数(FFR)的影响,评价FFR指导糖尿病患者冠状动脉临界病变介入治疗的可靠性。方法:入选经定量冠状动脉造影示临界病变(狭窄40%~70%)且进行FFR测量的糖尿病患者21例,非糖尿病患者36例。依据管腔狭窄程度(40%~50%,51%~60%,61%~70%)进行分组,比较每组中糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者FFR值的差异。结果:糖尿病患者临界病变共37处,非糖尿病患者临界病变共57处。冠状动脉狭窄程度相似时,糖尿病组和非糖尿病组的FFR值无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:糖尿病微血管病变对FFR值无显著影响,FFR指导糖尿病患者临界病变的介入治疗是可靠的。Objective : To investigate the effect of diabetes on fractional flow reserve ( FFR ) values, and assess the reliability of FFR measurement in guiding the interventional therapy in diabetic patients with coronary marginal lesions. Methods: Fifty-seven patients with coronary marginal lesions who undergone FFR measurement were enrolled in our study. The patients were divided according to the degree of the luminal narrowing(stenosis 40% - 50% ,51% - 60% ,61% - 70% ). Then the FFR values of the patients with and without diabetes were compared in each category. Results:There were thirty-seven marginal lesions in diabetic groups, and fifty-seven lesions in non-diabetic patients. There was no significance between the FFR values of diabetic patients and non-diabetic patients who had similar degree of stenosis. Conclusion : The disfunctional microvessels in diabetic patients does not have a significant impact on FFR values and FFR is reliable to guide the interventional therapy in diabetic patients with marginal stenosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195