检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐萌[1] 张应阔[2] 陈来宝 徐峰 谈伟君[1] 吴江北 查洪武 虞秀珍[1] 李纯德[1]
机构地区:[1]南京铁道医学院,210009 [2]南京军区军事医学研究所 [3]南京铁路卫生防疫站
出 处:《中国媒介生物学及控制杂志》2000年第4期251-252,共2页Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control
基 金:铁道部站车卫生基金资助项目
摘 要:目的 :比较溴敌隆和溴杀灵对旅客列车不同车厢的灭鼠效果。方法 :在车厢四角投放毒饵 ,用粉块法调查灭鼠前后密度 ,考核灭效。结果 :0 .0 1%溴敌隆在旅客列车上的总灭鼠率为88.2 % ,软卧和硬座车分别为 10 0 %和 98.91% ,0 .0 2 %溴杀灵在旅客列车上的总灭鼠率为 38.3% ,软卧和硬座车分别为 85 .71%和 5 4.5 5 %。结论 :溴敌隆灭鼠效果优于溴杀灵 ,在同一列车上软卧和硬座车厢的灭鼠效果优于餐车和硬卧车厢 。Object: To compare with deratization effectiveness of Bromadiolone and Bromethalin in different car of passenger train. Methord: Poison bait of Bromadiolone and Bromethalin was used for killing rats at foursqure of the car, the population density was determined with powderedspot methord., then the effectiveness of killing rats was checked. Result: In all deratization rate of 0.01 % Bromadiolone was 88.2 %, the deratization rate of sleeping car softly and seat car were 100% and 98.91 % respectively. In all deratization rate of 0.02 % Bromethalin was 38.3 %, the deratization rate of sleeping railroad car softly and seat car were 85.71 % and 54.55 % respactively. Conclusion: The deratization rate of Bromediolone was better than Bromethalin. In same a list of train, the effectiveness of killing rate of sleeping car softly and seat car were better than dining car and sleeping car forcedly, and emphases of killing rats with passenger train must be putted dining car and sleeping car forcedly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.76