检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢佳宏[1] 孟宏[1] 郑晓阳[1] 吕旭[1] 王虹[3] 周允娴[2] 王宏才[2]
机构地区:[1]中国中医科学院针灸医院皮肤科,北京100700 [2]中国中医科学院针灸医院专家门诊,北京100700 [3]首都医科大学附属同仁医院针灸科,北京100730
出 处:《国际中医中药杂志》2013年第7期597-599,共3页International Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:基金项目:中国中医科学院“名医名家传承”项目(项目编号:CM20121037)
摘 要:目的观察温胆汤加减方对痰热瘀结型寻常性痤疮的临床疗效。方法收集2011年4月至2012年12月中国中医科学院针灸医院皮肤科门诊、专家门诊以及首都医科大学附属同仁医院传统医学科的痤疮患者,采用随机数字表法,按1:1的比例随机分为两组各31例,治疗组在饮食控制的基础上口服温胆汤加减以清热化痰,对照组只进行饮食控制,不予口服汤药,两组均治疗6周后判定疗效。结果①皮损严重程度变化比较:治疗后,治疗组在皮损症状如压痛、潮红、囊肿、结节积分[分别为(0.71±0.32)分、(0.47±0.63)分、(0.59±0.53)分、(0.63±0.54)分]改善,与对照组治疗后[分别为(1.12±0.32)分、(1.44±0.21)分、(1.40±0.36)分、(1.18±0.43)分]比较,差异均有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。②症状积分变化比较:治疗后治疗组中医症状评分与同组治疗前比较,差异有统计学意义[分别为(42.95±1.53)分、(52.89±1.98)分,P〈0.05],且优于对照组疗效[(49.42±1.56)分,P〈O.05]。③临床疗效比较:治疗后,治疗组总有效率为96.77%(30/31)、对照组为54.83%(17/31),两组总有效率比较,差异有统计学意义(矿=14.862,P〈0.05)。结论温胆汤加减方能有效的治疗痰热瘀结型寻常性痤疮。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of Wendan decoction in the treatment of phlegm-heat accumulation type acne vulgaris. Methods 62 patients with phlegm-heat accumulation type acne vulgaris were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group randomly, with 31 patients in each group. The control group was given dietary advice and skin cleansing techniques, while the treatment group was given oral administration of Wendan decoction on the basis of the control group. Results ①skin damage comparison: after the treatment, skin damage symptoms such as tenderness (0.71±0.32), redness (0.47±0.63), cyst(0.59±0.53), and tubercle (0.63±0.54) in the treatment group were significantly improved than the control group [the values were (1.12±0.32), (1.44±0.21), (1.40±0.36),(1.18±0.43), respectively] (P〈 0.05). ②symptoms score comparison: The symptoms score in the treatment group after the treatment (42.95±1.53) was significantly improved than that before the treatment (52.89±1.98), (P〈0.05), and also obviously better than the control group after the treatment. ③clinical efficacy comparison: Total efficacy was 96.77% in the treatment group and 54.83% in the control group, showing marked difference(P〈0.05). Conclusion Wendan decoction is effective in treating phlegm-heat accumulation type acne vulgaris.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28