检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张旭红[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨师范大学,哈尔滨150025
出 处:《外语学刊》2013年第3期42-47,共6页Foreign Language Research
基 金:国家社科基金项目"深层回指的语篇表述理论消解失效问题及其解决研究"(11BYY113)的阶段性成果
摘 要:Van der Sandt的约束论通过将先设纳入到话语表征理论(DRT)的研究范围,部分地解决了DRT对先设消解的无效问题。然而,研究表明,约束论并未对先设与世界知识之间的相互作用做出合理的解释,因此,它也并未从根本上解决DRT对深层回指消解无效的问题。DRT及其现有衍生理论要想真正走出对深层回指消解无效的困境,关于世界知识的形式化问题无论如何都是无法回避的课题,因为它是解决自然语言意义问题的唯一出路。本文从"常规关系"的形式化研究入手,展开对"溯因推理"在约束论中的应用研究,旨在挖掘约束论对深层回指消解无效的成因。By introducing presupposition into DRT, Van der Sandt proposed the Binding Theory as an extension of DRT, which has solved the problem with invalid presupposition resolution encountered by DRT. However, my research shows that it fails to funda- mentally solve the problem of invalid deep anaphora resolution in DRT as it has not yet provided a reasonable explanation about interaction between presupposition and the world knowledge. This paper advocates that the only way out of current embarrassing situation for DRT and its existing derivative theories is to figure out a formal way of depicting world knowledge in the process of discourse interpretation. Aiming at disclosing failures of deep anaphora resolution, the paper sets about exploring an application of abductive reasoning to the Binding Theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177