检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张月娟[1] 王进礼[1] 周喻[1] 张刚[1] 李茹[1] 段丽萨
机构地区:[1]武警后勤学院军事心理学教研室,天津300162
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2013年第3期389-392,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:天津市哲学社会科学基金(TJJX12-168)
摘 要:目的:在军校学员群体中初步修订创伤后成长量表,进行条目分析、探索并验证其因子结构。方法:将创伤后成长量表翻译成中文,施测于706名近几年经历各种创伤事件的军校学员。将样本按事件奇偶分半,样本1(n=353)用于探索性因素分析,样本2(n=353)用于验证性因素分析和信度检验。结果:①探索性因素分析抽取4个特征值大于1的因子(个人力量的改变、对生活的理解和欣赏、人际关系的改变、新的可能性),能解释总方差的56.37%。②验证性因素分析4因子模型,χ2/df=3.054,NNFI=0.88,CFI=0.90,GFI=0.89,IFI=0.90,RMSEA=0.076。③4因子结构的量表内部一致性信度α=0.902。结论:修订后的4因子结构量表信、效度检验基本达到心理测量学要求,可用于大学生群体创伤后成长的评估。Objective: To revise Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) among Chinese military undergraduates, and to examine the factor structure of PTGI. Methods: PTGI was first translated into Chinese, and then was administrated to 706 military undergraduates who had experienced a significant negative life event during the past several years. Two subsam- pies were split by odd and even: one(n=353) was examined with the Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA), and the other(n= 353) was examined with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results: (~)EFA produced four factors with eigenvalues greater than one, accounting for 56.37% of the common variance. The factors were labeled change of persona/strength, appreciation of life, change of relation to others, new possibilities. @)CFA indicated the 4 factor model(x2/df=-3.054, NNFI= 0.88 ,CFI--0.90,GFI=0.89 ,IFI=0.90, RMSEA=0.076) was superior to the original 5 factor model of PTGI. (3)The internal consistency of the 4 factor model of PTGI was α=0.902. Conclusion: The validity and reliability of the revised version of PTGI is acceptable, It is applicable to trauma-related research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26