益处发现量表中文版在乳腺癌患者中的信效度检验  

Reliability and Validity of the Benefit Finding Scale in Women with Breast Cancer

作　　者：王瑜萍[1] 李玲艳[1] 杨玉玲[1] 蔡琳[1] 陈干农[2] 唐立利[3] 朱熊兆[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理学研究所,长沙410011 [2]中南大学湘雅二医院乳甲外科,长沙410011 [3]中南大学湘雅医院乳腺科,长沙410008

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2013年第3期410-413,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：国家"十一五"科技支撑计划课题(2009BAI77B06)基金资助

摘　　要：目的:评估益处发现量表中文版(BFS-C)在女性乳腺癌患者中的信效度。方法:用BFS-C对605名女性乳腺癌患者施测,间隔四周后随机选取100名被试进行重测。同时采用流调中心用抑郁量表和贝克焦虑问卷作为效标测量工具。结果:探索性因素分析结果表明该量表具有5个因子,分别为:个人成长、世界观、家庭关系、社会关系和接受;总量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.96,五个因子的α系数在0.77至0.90之间;总量表及五个因子的重测信度均在0.7以上;验证性因素分析表明该量表五因子结构拟合良好;与抑郁和焦虑显著负相关。结论:益处发现量表中文版具有良好的信度和效度,是评估乳腺癌患者益处发现的可靠工具。Objective： To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Benefit Finding Scale （BFS-C） in women with breast cancer. Methods： 605 women with breast cancer were measured by BFS-C, CES-D and BAI. One month later, 100 of the patients finished BFS-C again. Results： The scale was composed of five factors： personal growth, world view, family relations, social relations and acceptance; the Cronbaeh＇s alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.96 and for the five factors ranged from 0.77 to 0.90; the test-retest reliability of the total scale and five factors were more than 0.70; the confirmatory factor analysis results confirmed the structure of five factors model. Conclusion： The BFS-C is a reliable and valid measure for Chinese women with breast cancer.

关 键 词：益处发现 乳腺癌 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]