检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江省肿瘤医院头颈放疗科(19病区),浙江杭州310022 [2]首都医科大学耳鼻喉科,北京100050 [3]浙江省肿瘤医院头颈外科,浙江杭州310022
出 处:《中国现代医生》2013年第19期106-108,111,共4页China Modern Doctor
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81025007)
摘 要:目的探讨喉癌患者术后实施系统自我护理干预对生存质量的影响。方法研究对象为我院收治的125例喉癌待手术的患者,将其分组:对照组62例给予常规术后护理及实施健康教育,观察组63例在对照组的基础上给予系统自我护理。结果 (1)两组QLQ-C30各项评分出院时和干预结束时均明显降低;与对照组比较,观察组明显较高(P<0.05)。(2)观察组与对照组呼吸困难、失眠、食欲降低及便秘等比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论能够通过实施系统自我护理干预促进疾病的康复,使喉癌患者术后的生存质量得到显著提高,可以作为一种有效的护理方法在临床进行推广应用。Objective To explore the impact of the life quality of patients with laryngeal cancer after systemic self- care intervention. Methods A total of 125 cases with laryngeal cancer were selected in our hospital, they were divided into two groups, the control group (n = 62) was given routine postoperative care, and the observation group (n = 63) was given the systemic self-care on the basis of the control group. Results (1)Compared with before the intervention, all the function scores of QLQ-C30 in two groups in the discharge and end of the intervention were significant lower; Compared with control group, QLQ-C30 function scores in the observation group were significantly higher (P 〈 0.05). (2)Compared with control group, dyspnea, insomnia, loss of appetite, and constipation in the observation group had sig- nificant difference (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The rehabilitation of the disease can be facilitated through the implementa- tion of the systemic self-care intervention, which can significantly improve the quality of life of laryngeal cancer pa- tients and can be used as an effective method of care in clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229