从论文分析与调查结果谈综述类文章写作  

On writing of review articles based on paper analysis and survey results

作　　者：周蕾[1] 陈宏丽[1] 马荣荣[1] 吴海鸽[1] 尤海燕[1] 刘巧平[2] 王海彤[2] 陈红[2] 肖红艳[1] 刘梅[1] 冯淬灵[2] 席宁[1] 李岩[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学,北京100029 [2]北京中医药大学东直门医院

出　　处：《北京中医药大学学报》2013年第6期413-416,共4页Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：北京中医药大学校级课题(No.2011-X-053)

摘　　要：从《北京中医药大学学报(中医临床版)》杂志中抽取10篇综述,设计并在北京中医药大学及其附属医院范围随机发放50份"对综述写作的认识调查表"进行研究。结果显示:综述作者多为在读研究生和中低职称人员,多中心多学科合作完成者较少;常见主要问题有题名不准确、没有方法学描述、参考文献缺乏循证依据、缺乏文末评述等;普遍认为写综述较容易,应该按一定的标准选择文献资料、运用统计学方法处理数据、发表作者自身的观点。提出转变思想认识、端正态度;明确写作要求;按循证原则规范临床观察类论文等措施。对于提高综述写作水平具有现实意义。The study extracted 10 pieces of review articles from the Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine （Clinical Medicine）, and designed and issued randomly 50 questionnaires for surveying the cognition on review article writing in our university and affiliated hospitals. The results showed that the authors of review articles are mostly postgraduates and personnel with junior or intermediate professional titles, among them less have conducted multi-center and multi-discipline studies. The common problems include inaccurate paper titles, and lack of methodological descriptions, evidence-based basis in reference and comments at the end of paper. The respondents generally thought that it is easy to write review articles, reference materials should be chosen according to some standards, data should be treated with statistical methods, and authors should express their own views. Some measures have been proposed including transforming ideological understanding, having good attitudes, defining writing demands and regulating the articles on clinical observation according to evidence-based principles.

关 键 词：论文分析 问卷调查 综述 治疗性 中医药 

分 类 号：G232[文化科学]