检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭冏
出 处:《环境卫生工程》2013年第3期28-30,33,共4页Environmental Sanitation Engineering
摘 要:通过模拟垃圾焚烧电厂内垃圾坑的实际条件,针对厌氧及好氧2种发酵方式进行了生活垃圾的生物干燥实验研究。结果表明:厌氧方式对生活垃圾的生物干燥效果不明显,自然厌氧发酵、接种厌氧发酵的垃圾脱水率均不超过5%;好氧方式对生活垃圾的生物干燥效果明显优于厌氧方式,在所研究条件下,通风量3.3×10-8m3/(s.kg)、发酵时间80 h的垃圾好氧生物干燥效果最佳,水分脱除率可达15.3%。Through simulating actual conditions of waste pit in waste incineration plants, aiming at anaerobic and aerobic fermentation, the bio-drying experimental study of domestic waste was carried out. The result showed that the anaerobic bio- drying effect of domestic waste is not obvious, waste dehydration rate is less than 5% by natural anaerobic fermentation and inoculating anaerobic fermentation. Aerobic bio-drying effect of domestic waste is obviously better than that of the anaerobic way. Under the research condition, dehydration rate of waste can reach 15. 3% with ventilation quantity of 3.3 × 10^-8 m^3/(s·kg) and fermentation time of 80 hours.
分 类 号:X799.3[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28