检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南昌大学 [2]江西省人民医院消化内科 [3]江西中医学院附属医院,江西南昌330006
出 处:《九江学院学报(自然科学版)》2013年第2期76-79,共4页Journal of Jiujiang University:Natural Science Edition
摘 要:目的比较和评价单形标志物和多形标志物法测定功能性便秘患者结肠通过时间。方法选择符合功能性便秘罗马Ⅲ诊断标准的患者作为实验组,取健康志愿者作为对照组,应用单形和多形不透X线标志物法分别测定全结肠通过时间,结合临床资料数据对照比较。结果实验1(单形标志物法)和实验2(多形标志物法)便秘组和对照组的TG-ITT、MITT、RCTT、LCTT、SRTT差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。实验1和实验2组50﹪TGITT和80﹪TGITT摄片数差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论多形标志物法进行结肠通过时间测定优于单形标志物法。Objective Comparison and evaluation of single sign determination of gut transit time in clinical application in patients with functional constipation and polymorphic marker method.Me thod Select the patients met the diagnostic criteria of Rome functional constipation as experimental group,healthy volunteers as control group,using single and polymorphic impermeable total colonic transit time were measured by X-ray marker method,compared with the control of clinical data.Re sult Experiment 1(single marker method) and Experiment 2(polymorphic marker method) there were significant differences in constipation group and control group TGITT,MITT,RCTT,LCTT,SRTT(p 0.05).Experiment 1(single marker method) constipation group and Experiment 2(polymorphic marker method) constipation group there was a significant difference between 50% TGITT and 80% TGITT of shoot number(p 0.05).Conclusion Polymorphic marker method method for the determination of the intestinal tract through time is better than single marker method method for the determination of the intestinal tract through time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.158.217