检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学司法鉴定中心
出 处:《医学与法学》2013年第3期63-65,共3页Medicine and Jurisprudence
摘 要:目前,国内绝大多数医疗相关尸体解剖不是为了吸取临床经验教训、提高医疗质量,而是为了解决纠纷、寻求经济赔偿。对于涉及死亡的医疗纠纷,特别是死因不明或医患双方对临床死因诊断有异议的纠纷,尸体解剖是无可替代的解决问题的基础和重要依据。但是,我国现行的尸体解剖相关规范与实践检案要求有很大的差距。相关行业规范的不完善,导致了医疗纠纷处理难、社会效应差、资源浪费和医患矛盾的进一步加深。规范尸体解剖对于在现行医疗制度下解决医疗纠纷有着极其重要的意义。本文就医疗纠纷中尸体解剖问题的规范化提出了自己的看法,以期能为医疗纠纷鉴定工作提供一定参考。At present the purpose of most of the medical disputes autopsy in China is not to learn from clinic or improve the quality of medical treatment, but to resolve disputes and seek financial compensation. Autopsy is an irreplaceable foundation to solve the problems and an important evidence for medical disputes involving death, especially for the dysoemia, or the patients and doctors can not reach agreement on the clinical cause of death. But there is still a large gap between the current autopsy norms and the actual demand for case inspection in Chi- na. The imperfection of the related specifications results in the difficulty of settling disputes, adverse social effects, the waste of social resources and the deepening of the doctor-patient conflicts. So the improvement and standardization of autopsy has extremely important significance in resolving medical disputes under the present medical system. In this paper, the author presents ideas about the improvement and standardization of autopsy with the purpose of offering some preference for the identification of medical disputes.
关 键 词:医疗纠纷 尸体解剖 医疗损害 法医病理 司法鉴定
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D918.9[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30