检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]枣庄市台儿庄区人民医院,山东枣庄277400
出 处:《基层医学论坛》2013年第18期2331-2332,共2页The Medical Forum
摘 要:目的对比分析全髋关节置换术后健侧与患侧翻身患者的舒适度。方法将166例全髋关节置换术后患者随机分为干预组和对照组,每组各83例,干预组患者术后向健侧翻身,对照组患者术后向患侧翻身,术后1周评价2组患者的舒适度。结果干预组患者疼痛度明显低于对照组,安全感及方便程度显著高于对照组,干预组患者整体舒适度显著提高,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论全髋关节置换术后健侧翻身比患侧翻身舒适度显著提高。Objective The study of contralateral and ipsilateral emancipated patient comfort.Methods 166 patients of total hip arthroplasty were randomly divided into intervention groups(n=83) and control groups(n=83),contralateral emancipated of intervention groups,ipsilateral emancipated of control groups,evaluation patients comfort of the two groups after one week.Results Intervention group patients pain is significantly lower than the control group,a sense of security and convenient degree of the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group,the intervention group patients significantly improved overall comfort,and the difference was statistically significant(P &lt;0.01).Conclusion Patients comfort was significantly improve of contralateral than ipsilateral emancipated of total hip arthroplasty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28