检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄启顺[1] 甘萌[1] 郑怀远[1] 周学武[1] 周攀[1] 陈振兵[1]
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院手外科,武汉430022
出 处:《华中科技大学学报(医学版)》2013年第3期290-293,共4页Acta Medicinae Universitatis Scientiae et Technologiae Huazhong
基 金:湖北省自然科学基金资助项目(No.2011CDB392)
摘 要:目的比较不同自体神经移植材料在移植修复周围混合神经缺损时的再生效果。方法取45只SD大鼠,随机分成3组,分别切除0.5cm右侧坐骨神经,建立神经缺损模型。运动神经移植组:取左侧后肢的股神经运动支移植修复缺损的坐骨神经;感觉神经移植组:取左侧后肢的腓肠神经移植修复缺损的坐骨神经;混合神经移植组:取左侧后肢的坐骨神经移植修复。分别于术后2、4和8周,采用神经夹捏实验测量神经再生长度,处死动物后取下术侧腓肠肌称取肌肉湿重。术后8周取胫神经远侧吻合口远端3mm神经组织行甲苯胺蓝染色,同时电镜下观察神经纤维的直径及髓鞘的厚度,采用图像分析软件进行图片分析,计数神经纤维总数并计算神经纤维的密度。结果神经再生长度,术后2周时3组间差异无统计学意义;术后4、8周时运动神经移植组及混合神经移植组大于感觉神经移植组(均P<0.05)。腓肠肌湿重,术后2、4周时3组间差异无统计学意义;术后8周时运动神经移植组和混合神经移植组重于感觉神经移植组(均P<0.05)。术后8周时,在运动神经移植组和混合神经移植组中可见大量神经纤维生长,神经纤维的数量、轴突的密度均大于感觉神经移植组(均P<0.05);再生神经轴突在运动神经移植组更加成熟。结论不同的神经移植材料对自体神经移植再生效果有着显著影响。运动神经及混合神经移植修复自体周围神经缺损时的再生效果优于感觉神经移植。Objective To compare effects of different autologous nerve grafts on the regeneration of the peripheral mixed nerve.Methods Nerve defect models were established by removing 0.5cm right sciatic nerve in SD rats(n=45).Then,the animals received motor,sensory or mixed nerve grafts,which originated from the femoral nerve,sural nerve and sciatic nerve of the contralateral hind limb.At 2,4 and 8 weeks post operation,the nerve pinch test was performed to measure the length of the regenerated nerve,and the wet weight of the gastrocnemius muscle of the operated limb was measured.The tissues(3mm in length)of the tibial nerve distal to the anastomosis were stained by toluidine blue staining,and the diameter of the nerve fibers and the thickness of the myelin were determined by electron microscopy on week 8 after operation.Image analysis software was used to analyze the pictures,and the total number of nerve fibers was counted and the density of nerve fibers calculated.Results Histomorphometry of the regenerated nerves at 8 weeks demonstrated robust nerve regeneration in both motor and mixed nerve graft groups.In contrast,poor nerve regeneration was observed in sensory nerve graft group,as evidenced by significantly decreased nerve fiber counts and nerve density when compared with mixed and motor groups(P〈0.05).Moreover,the length of the regenerated nerve in the motor and the mixed nerve graft groups were greater than that in the sensory nerve graft group at 4 and 8 weeks post operation(P〈0.05).The wet weight of the gastrocnemius muscle in the motor and the mixed nerve graft groups were greater than that in the sensory nerve graft group at 8 weeks post operation(P〈0.05).Conclusion Motor or mixed nerve grafts,rather than sensory nerve grafts,contribute to the regeneration of the peripheral mixed nerve
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.0.231