对中国妇女参政问题的思考——以后现代女权主义为视角  

Chinese Women’s Political Participation from a Postmodern Feminist Perspective

作　　者：杨静[1] 

机构地区：[1]中华女子学院性别与社会发展学院

出　　处：《中华女子学院学报》2013年第2期67-71,共5页Journal of China Women＇s University

摘　　要：本质主义的女权主义将"女人"等同于有生殖能力,女人基于性而有普遍性。现代女权主义理论在此基础上作出了女人们普遍接受压迫和统一的妇女解放运动的论述。后现代女权主义理论对现代女权主义基于生理性别的对女性的划分给予了颠覆,认为生理性别也是一种社会建构,女人是被论述建构和后天模仿的结果。因此解构了对妇女参政问题的认识,如参政妇女有多样性和差异性,不是所有的妇女都有参政的意识;除非有为妇女而参政的论述出现,否则参政妇女的结构位置不必然出现为妇女参政的主体位置。这些理论再次引发我们对推动妇女参政问题的深入思考,也为在政治领域中推动性别公正提供了强有力的思想武器。The theory of postmodern feminism subverts the division of women by modem feminism based on physiological gender and asserts that physiological gender is also a kind of social construction, and that woman is the result of the construction of discourse and acquired imitation. It thus deconstructs the theory on women ＇ s participation in politics, such as women in politics demonstrate diversity and difference and that not all women have political participation awareness. Unless there is a discourse on women＇s political participation, the structural position of women＇s participation in politics should not be necessarily shown as its subject position. All these thoughts again invite deep consideration of the issue of promoting women＇ s participation in politics. At the same time, they can be used as a powerful ideological weapon to promote gender equality in the field of politics.

关 键 词：后现代女权主义 妇女参政 为妇女而参政 

分 类 号：C913.68[经济管理]