检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]荆门市第二人民医院创伤外科,湖北荆门448000
出 处:《临床急诊杂志》2013年第6期281-282,共2页Journal of Clinical Emergency
摘 要:目的:探讨对外科感染性疾病积极外科治疗与用传统方法治疗两者伤口愈合的时间关系。方法:将几种外科感染性疾病随机分成例数相同的两组,进行不同方法的治疗,并进行前瞻性研究。结果:外科感染疾病1880例中,940例(实验组)采用积极外科治疗(清理创面+缝合+引流法),有780例(83%)获得良好效果,并且较对照组愈合时间缩短。940例(对照组)采用切开感染创面及脓腔(切排+纱布填塞法),然后开放伤口进行纱布填塞和包扎。实验组治疗愈合时间明显低于对照组(P<0.01)。结论:对外科感染疾病进行积极外科治疗,患者住院时间缩短,医院院内感染显著减少。Objective:To compared the of positive surgical treatment and traditional method on wound heahng time in surgical infection . Method:Several kinds of surgical infectious disease random divided into two groups and carried on the different methods of treatment. Result:In 1 880 cases with surgical infection, 940 cases (experimental group) treated with positive surgical therapy (cleaning wound+ suture+ drainage)and the others 940 cases re- ceived conventional treatment(cut row+gauze packing method). The experimental group demonstrated better re- suits and shorter healing time (P〈0. 01). Conclusion: For surgical infection disease with positive surgical treat- ment, patients in hospital time is shortened and the hospital nosocomial infection significantly reduce.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229