检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海海事大学商船学院,上海201306 [2]航泰律师事务所,上海200122
出 处:《上海海事大学学报》2013年第2期70-74,共5页Journal of Shanghai Maritime University
摘 要:基于诉讼时效直接决定着当事人是否具有胜诉权,且海事诉讼时效制度尤其是海事诉讼时效的中断又与民事诉讼时效的中断不尽相同,从诉讼时效制度设立意义的角度及我国司法现状出发,对海事诉讼时效的中断进行探讨,以期引起共鸣,并对实务界有所助益.Considering that litigation limitation can directly determine whether a party can succeed in a suit, and there are some differences between maritime litigation limitation rule, especially the interruption of limitation in maritime litigation, and the interruption of limitation in civil litigation, the interruption of limitation in maritime litigation is discussed from the angle of establishing litigation limitation rule and starting from the current situation of judicature in China, in the hope of arousing sympathetic response and contributing to the practice in maritime law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.118