解决国际贸易救济调查案件中的出口自律与反垄断法的符合性分析  

The Analysis of the Compliance between the Antimonopoly Law and the Export Self-discipline Implementing for Dealing with Trade Remedy Cases

作　　者：李勰[1] 

机构地区：[1]商务部进出口公平贸易局,北京100731

出　　处：《世界贸易组织动态与研究（上海对外贸易学院学报）》2012年第3期28-33,共6页Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics

摘　　要：当前我国出口产品所遇到的贸易救济调查数量和涉案金额明显增加,通过政府交涉和法律抗辩取得的应对效果却不尽如人意,与此同时,一些贸易救济案件通过出口自律的方式取得了较为理想的效果。但对出口自律做法与有关法规的符合性存在不少质疑,尤其是该做法是否有违国内外反垄断法。本文从国内与国外两个层面,分析了出口自律与有关反垄断法规的符合性,并就有关问题提出了建议。In the past several years, the number of trade remedy cases related Chinese exported products and the value thereof increased both evidently, while the results of these cases through the government negotiation and legal defense were not satisfied. During this period, several trade remedy cases were settled smoothly by the method of self-discipline. But there were some doubts about the compliance between the self-discipline practice and some laws, especially the antimonopoly law. Here this thesis is tried to analyze the compliance between the self-discipline practice and the antimonopoly law from domestic and foreign aspects and to propose some suggestions.

关 键 词：贸易救济 出口自律 反垄断法 

分 类 号：F741[经济管理—国际贸易]