重症颅脑损伤的急诊救治分析  被引量:8

Emergency treatment of patients with severe traumatic brain injury

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:贾亿卿[1] 王立秋[1] 林朱森[1] 陈瑞丰[1] 黄立嵩[1] 郑吉波[1] 

机构地区:[1]解放军海军总医院急诊科,北京100048

出  处:《临床军医杂志》2013年第6期560-561,共2页Clinical Journal of Medical Officers

摘  要:目的总结重症颅脑损伤的救治经验。方法将我院自2011年2月—2012年1月救治的47例重症颅脑损伤患者按治疗方法分为观察组和对照组,其中观察组24例,对照组23例,且两组患者在性别、年龄、致伤原因以及格拉斯哥昏迷(GCS)评分等方面均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。观察组24例患者积极进行手术治疗,对照组23例患者行非手术治疗。结果观察组24例患者经过院前积极的抢救和院内及时的手术治疗,优良率为50.00%;而对照组23例患者中,优良率为21.74%。两组间优良率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.062 9,P<0.05)。结论重症颅脑损伤一般情况非常危急,在临床治疗过程中,急诊手术治疗的效果显著优于非手术治疗,因此对于重症颅脑损伤患者不但要进行积极的院外抢救,入院后要及时进行手术治疗,以提高患者的治疗效果。采用院外急救和院内手术治疗相结合的方法对挽救重症颅脑损伤患者的生命具有非常重要的意义。Objective To investigate the experience in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods A total of 47 patients with severe TBI admitted to our hospital from February 2011 to January 2012 were divided trial group ( n = 24 ) and con- trol group (n = 23). There were no significant differences in terms of gender, age, cause and Glasgrow coma score (GCS) between the two groups. The trial group was treated with active surgical operation, while the control group was treated conservatively. Results After a positive pre-hospital rescue and a timely nosocomial surgical treatment, the excellent rate of the trial group was 50.00% , significantly higher than that (21.74%) of the control group ( X2 = 4. 062 9, P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion In addition to active pre- hospital rescue, the clinical effect of emergency surgery on patients with severe TBI is significantly superior to that of conservative treatment.

关 键 词:重型颅脑损伤 急诊救治 院外急救 手术治疗 

分 类 号:R651.15[医药卫生—外科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象