优美的循环:对范·胡克的法律职业化与法律自治性理论述评  

Beautiful Cycles:Comments on Van?Hoecke's Theories of Legal Professionalism and Autonomy in the Law

作　　者：张欣[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2013年第2期51-57,共7页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：范·胡克的法律职业化理论对"人"在法律系统中的位置进行了合理阐释;重视并强调法律学说对法律系统的发展和合法化的作用;较多关注法律职业与法律自治的关系。但是,其理论缺失对法律职业群体内部自治性的探讨;将政治/权力系统的作用和法律合法化的重任赋予法官,使得实践中的"商议性沟通"效果减弱,在理论上会消解而不是重构法律的自治性。Van Hoecke＇s theory of legal professionalism gives proper explanations about the position of ＂man＂ in the legal system. His theory stresses and emphasizes effects of legal doctrines on the development and legitimization of the legal system and pays great attention to relationships between legal profession and autonomy in the law. However, his theory fails to explore autonomy inside the legal profession and endows with judges the important tasks of functioning political or power systems and legitimizing the law, which lessens effects of＂consultative commtmication＂ in practice, and in theory irons out, instead of reshaping, autonomy in the law.

关 键 词：法律职业化 法律自治 法律的沟通之维 

分 类 号：D916[政治法律—法学]