论欧盟航空排放交易规则下的管辖权冲突——从欧盟法院航空碳税案说起  

On the Conflict of Jurisdiction Caused by Aviation Carbon Emission Trading System of EU——Analysis from the EU Case of Aviation Emission

作　　者：肖峰[1] 郑煜[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400045

出　　处：《北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第4期106-111,共6页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费科研专项"研究生科技创新基金"重点资助项目"气候变化背景下生物多样性保护法律问题研究"(CDJXS10082222)

摘　　要：欧盟将航空业纳入碳排放交易体系触发了各国就全航程排放的管辖冲突,成为国际碳减排规则的新问题。从欧盟法院航空碳税案裁决看,原因是各国就确立各航段空域排放管辖的标准认识不同,是国家减排行为边界国际法依据模糊和个别国家对气候谈判诱导试图的共同产物。据此,应明确领空内排放由主权国属地管辖,公海上空排放则根据气候变化公约确认是否突破航空器属人管辖而采普遍管辖或保护性管辖;对欧盟单边性意图,应集合贸易与减排国际法制度效力加以应对。EU has enrolled aviation industry into the carbon emission trading system,which raised jurisdiction conflicts about the whole journey among different countries.This has become a new problem about the international regulation on carbon emission.Analyzing the EU Court’s verdict of carbon emission tax on airlines,each country has different understanding of carbon emission standards in each air-zone,which is the direct result of ambiguous definition for state’s boundary of emission and influences of certain countries exerted in unilateral climate change negotiations.Hence,there should be exclusive territorial jurisdiction of the carbon emission in the territorial sky.For High Sea,the jurisdiction should follow the Convention on Climate Change to identify if the aircraft has reached out of personal jurisdiction to universal jurisdiction or protective jurisdiction.For the unilateral objective of EU,it should be internationally responded with combination of trading and emission rules.

关 键 词：欧盟 航空碳排放 裁决要旨 管辖权冲突 国际应对 

分 类 号：D997.3[政治法律—国际法学]