“历史”与“逻辑”关系的两种表述  

Two Expressions of the Reflection between Logic and History

作　　者：张践明[1] 黄信[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学哲学与历史文化学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第4期100-105,共6页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences

摘　　要："历史与逻辑的统一"和"逻辑的与历史的相一致"是不同内涵的两种表述。前者在黑格尔那里,本体论和方法论高度统一,历史就是逻辑的实现,逻辑的就是历史的;后者在历史唯物主义那里,本体论意义上承认历史有内在的客观规律,方法论意义上强调逻辑是历史的反映,历史对逻辑有先在性,历史的规律性展开便是逻辑的进程,这里,方法论、认识论与本体论都是统一的。逻辑主义和历史主义的科学哲学不应割裂逻辑与历史的联系。It is the expressions of different connotation about ＂uniformity of history and logic＂ and ＂logic＇ s consistent with history＇s approach＂. Highly unified in Hegel, ontology and methodology, is the realization of the logic of history and logic is history; Historical materialism, the ontological significance admits that history inner has objective laws ; As a methodology, expressed as ＂logic consistent with history approach＂, emphasis on logic is a reflection of the history, the history of logic in primary, history is the regularity of logical process. Here, the methodology, epistemology and ontology are unified too. Logicism and historieism in the philosophy of science should not be the link between logic and history.

关 键 词：历史与逻辑的统一 逻辑的与历史的相一致 历史唯物主义 历史决定论 

分 类 号：B03[哲学宗教—哲学理论] B081