检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:俞国庆[1] 汪远霞[1] 李俊霞[1] 陈建[1] 庄永泽[1]
出 处:《肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志》2013年第3期244-247,共4页Chinese Journal of Nephrology,Dialysis & Transplantation
基 金:南京军区医药卫生科研面上项目(09MA099)
摘 要:目的:观察尿毒症及腹膜透析(PD)两种状态对对大鼠腹膜电荷屏障的影响,研究电荷屏障与PD液白蛋白丢失的相关性,探讨肝素对PD大鼠腹膜电荷屏障与PD液白蛋白丢失的作用。方法:选取SD大鼠40只,随机分为对照组(假手术组,n=10)、尿毒症组(5/6肾切除,n=10)、PD组(n=10)和肝素组(n=10);所有大鼠PD 4周后收集血清及PD液,采用清除法测定胰淀粉酶清除率(Cpam)及唾液淀粉酶的清除率(Csam)的比值(Cpam/Csam)用以评价腹膜电荷屏障,同时测定PD液白蛋白的丢失量。结果:(1)对照组、尿毒症组、PD组及肝素组的腹膜Cpam/Csam结果分别为1.91±0.89,2.32±0.74、3.11±0.76和2.24±0.59。尿毒症组、PD组与对照组比较均有显著差异(P均<0.01),但尿毒症组和PD组间无显著差异;肝素组与PD组比较也有显著差异(P=0.008)。(2)尿毒症组、PD组及肝素组PD液白蛋白量显著高于对照组(41.3±8.34 mg,49.2±3.61 mg、39.9±3.73 mg vs 27.1±5.66 mg,P均<0.01);同时,PD组还显著高于尿毒症组(P=0.04),肝素组与PD组相比,亦有显著差异(P=0.001)。(3)所有大鼠Cpam/Csam与PD液白蛋白丢失量显著相关(r=-0.469,P=0.002)。结论:尿毒症会损害腹膜的电荷特性,PD会进一步损害电荷屏障,增加PD液白蛋白的丢失。PD液中增加肝素可改善电荷屏障,减少白蛋白丢失。Objective: To observe the influence of uremia, peritoneal dialysis on rat peritoneal charge barrier and the correlation between charge barrier and albumin loss from peritoneal dialysate, and to investigate the role of heparin on charge barrier and albumin loss. Methodology: Forty male SD rats were randomly divided into control group (sham operated group,n=10),uremia group (5/6 nephrectomy,n=10) , uremia with PD group (n=10) and heparin with PD group (n=10) . Study was carried out 4 weeks and blood sample and peritoneal fluid were collected, and then peritoneal charge barrier was measured by differential clearance of isoamylase (Cpam/Csam). Protein loss of peritoneal fluid was also determined. Result: (1)Cpam/Csam of control group, uremia group, PD group and heparin group were 1.91±0.89, 2.32±0.74 , 3.11±0.76 and 2.24±0.59 respectively. Figure of the three former were higher than control group significantly (P〈0.01 all) and there was also significantly difference between PD group and Heparin group, while no difference between uremia group and PD group. (2) Albumin loss of peritoneum in uremia group, PD group and Heparin group were significantly higher than that in control group (41.3±8.34 mg, 49.2±3.61 mg and 39.9±3.73 mg vs 27.1±5.66 mg, P〈0.01 all ). At the same time, the figure in PD group was remarkably higher than that in uremia group, P〈0.05. On the contrary, the figure in heparin group was significantly lower than that in PD group. (3) Cpam/Csam was negative correlated with protein loss (r=-0.469, P〈0.01). Conclusion: Charge barrier of peritoneum could be damaged at uremic state, and peritoneal dialysis may do harm to charge barrier further, however, heparin could improve charge barrier status and reduce the loss of albumin.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38