检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢永添[1]
出 处:《商业研究》2013年第7期158-164,共7页Commercial Research
摘 要:在过去的五次公司并购浪潮中,美国政府奉行的反垄断政策经历了由宽渐严、再由严渐宽的变迁过程。第三次浪潮之前的渐严变化是出于反对大企业垄断、保护国内市场自由竞争的考虑,第四次浪潮后的渐宽变化则更多地考虑经济全球化趋势下维护本国企业在全球的竞争地位。政策的变迁反映出美国政府"国家利益至上"的一贯立场。发达国家貌似公平的竞争规则往往给经济地位不同的国家造成不公平的后果。因此,在经济全球化的背景下,中国基于企业兼并的反垄断立法及司法原则,应致力于在促进市场公平竞争的基础上努力维护国家的经济安全和民族产业在国际经济中的地位。During the past five M&A waves, the anti - monopoly policies that the US government has carried out have gone through such a change process: from loose to rigorousness before the third wave and reverse since the fourth wave. Gradually change to rigorousness before the third wave is out of concern against big enterprises monopoly to protect the free competition in the domestic market. Gradually change to loose after the fourth wave is to protect its competitive posi- tion in the world under the trend of economic globalization. This change reflects the US's consistent stance for its supreme national interests. The speciously fair competitive rules put forward by the developed countries often give rise to unfair re- suits for developing countries. Therefore, under the trend of economic globalization, China should devote to maintaining its economic safety and protecting the due position of its national industries when is enacting and implementing its own anti - monopoly law.
分 类 号:F038.2[经济管理—政治经济学] F83
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4