现代汉语三类“非典型”双宾句内部的典型性  

Prototype of Three Kinds of Atypical Double Object Sentence in Modern Chinese

作　　者：张建[1] 杨光[2] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学文学院,吉林长春130024 [2]长春大学人事处,吉林长春130028

出　　处：《西南交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第4期25-28,共4页Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：2011年度教育部人文社会科学青年项目(11YJC740140);2012年度国家社会科学基金青年项目(12CYY049);东北师范大学哲学社会科学校内青年基金项目(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金)(12QN041)

摘　　要：基于原型范畴理论,现代汉语中表示给予义的双宾句表现为一个句式的连续统,而表称、致使、结果三类双宾句则处于这个连续统中不太典型的位置,同时这三类双宾句内部也存在着典型性的差异:表称类两个宾语之间插入的动词动作性越强就越靠近兼语句,反之就越靠近表称类双宾句;使动类内部的典型性为他动使动类高于自动使动类;结果类中"个+谓词性成分"如指向动词后面的间接宾语就可看作双宾句,如果是指向谓语动词或者是指向谓语动词前面的主语,那么在语义上则可看作是靠近动—宾—补语序的结构。Based on the theory of prototype category, double object sentences of ＂jiyu＂ represent a continuum in modern Chinese, and the ＂biaocheng＂, ＂shidong＂, ＂jieguo＂ are atypical locations of the continuum. At the same time, the internal structures of the three types of double object sentences have typical differences： the stronger the action of the verb inserted between the objects, the farther the sentence is to ＂biaocheng＂, and vice versa. It is close to double object sentence, and the actuate is more typical than the automatic in causive double object sentences. If the semantic meaning of ＂ge ＋ the predicate＂ leads indirect object, we regard it as double object sentences. If it leads predication or subject, we regard it as verb-object-complement structure in the semantic meaning

关 键 词：表称双宾句 致使双宾句 结果双宾句 典型性 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]