检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘洪华[1]
出 处:《韶关学院学报》2013年第7期43-46,共4页Journal of Shaoguan University
摘 要:侵权法立法必须通过制度设计在人们行为自由和权利保护之间实现利益平衡。过错归责、自己责任和构成要件等是侵权法一般利益衡量的利益平衡机制。无过错归责、规定过错和因果关系推定的举证责任分配制度是特殊利益衡量的利益平衡机制。侵权责任法第87条以分配正义理论,侧重被害人救济,扩大对人们行为自由的限制,但是它突破了既有侵权法理论对分配正义理论的适用模式,导致其所规定的责任承担没有侵权法理论上的依据。The legislation of Tort law should balance the interests between people's freedom of action and their rights protection by system design. Fault liability, assuming one's own responsibility and constitutive requirements are the interest balancing systems for general interest balancing. Non-fault liability, prescriptive fault and specially designed onus probandi by presumptive causality are the interest balancing systems for special interest balancing. Article 87 of Tort Liability Law lays particular emphasis on relief to the victims and enlarges the limits to people's freedom of action by using distributive justice theory. It breaks the usual operation pattern of the distributive justice in the existing theory of Tort Law and makes the liability it arranged no theory basis in Tort Law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188