检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沈阳建筑大学土木工程学院,辽宁沈阳110168
出 处:《沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版)》2013年第4期649-654,共6页Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University:Natural Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41072190)
摘 要:目的为了发挥井群干扰在基坑井点降水中的效果,取得合理井距,避免均匀布井降水效果不佳,减小降水对周围影响.方法在各个控制点水位降深达到设计降深的条件下,以各个控制点水位降深的最大值最小化为目标函数,运用MATLAB软件优化工具箱最大最小化进行优化求解,将优化结果与均匀布井进行对比分析.结果均匀布井控制点水位降深最大值与最小值之差为2.38 m,优化后为0.88 m,相比降低63.02%.结论该模型对基坑降水井群进行优化布置是可行的;在控制控制点水位降深方面,优化后的布置井距较均匀布井更加合理.In order to achieve the proper effect of interference in multi-well dewatering,to obtain reasonable well spacing,to avoid the effect during the precipitation,and to reduce the impact on the surroundings,this paper sets up the model based on optimal objective function with the minimum of the maximum valve of the control points drawdown,under the condition of various control points achieving the design drawdown,using the MATLAB software to obtain the optimal solution,and conducts a comparative analysis of drawdown between optimization and evenly-arranged well spacing.The results show that the difference between the maximum and the minimun drawdown is 2.38 m in evenly-arranged well spacing,while the optimal result is 0.88 m which reduces by 63.02% comparatively.The conclusion is that the model used in foundation pit multi-well dewatering optimization is feasible;Compared with evenly-arranged well spacing,the optimal result is more reasonable in terms of controlling the drawdown of control points.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49