护理干预对骨科患者术后两种镇痛效果及满意度的影响  

The Nursing Intervention Affects on Effects and Satisfaction of Two Analgesic Methods for Orthopedics Patients during Postoperation

作　　者：姜雪[1] 郎红娟[2] 杨小炜[3] 李娟[1] 李佳[1] 李瑞刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]第四军医大学唐都医院神经外科手术室,陕西西安710038 [2]唐都医院护理部,陕西西安710038 [3]唐都医院骨科,陕西西安710038

出　　处：《现代生物医学进展》2013年第18期3546-3549,共4页Progress in Modern Biomedicine

摘　　要：目的:探讨护理干预对骨科患者术后使用硬膜外持续微量注射镇痛及静脉自控微量注射镇痛效果的影响。方法:根据研究要求将患者按硬膜外持续微量注射镇痛及静脉自控微量注射镇痛方式分为实验组A、B组和对照组A、B组,实验组给予护理干预,对照组给予常规护理,然后对比两种术后镇痛方式护理干预组与常规护理组之间的镇痛满意度。结果:通过分析、比较,硬膜外持续微量注射镇痛患者及静脉自控微量注射镇痛患者镇痛满意度护理干预实验组均明显高于常规护理对照组。结论:常规的硬膜外持续微量注射镇痛及静脉自控微量注射镇痛使患者术后取得镇痛效果的过程中,系统的护理干预是提高镇痛满意度的重要因素。Objective：To discuss nursing intervention effects on Orthopedics patients with epidural persistent microinjection analgesia and intravenous self-control microinjection during postoperation.Methods：According to epidural persistent microinjection analgesia and intravenous self-control microinjection,patients were divided into two groups,experimental group A and B were given nursing intervention and control group A and B were given routine nursing care.Then,we compared the satisfaction of different group patients.Results：As for analgesia satisfaction,experimental group is higher than control group for patients with epidural sustained microinjection and intravenous self-control microinjection.Conclusion：In the process of epidural persistent microinjection analgesia and intravenous self-control microinjection during postoperation,the systemic nursing intervention is important to improve analgesia satisfaction.

关 键 词：镇痛泵 护理干预 镇痛满意度 

分 类 号：R68[医药卫生—骨科学] R47[医药卫生—外科学]