不同机械种植方式对水稻产量的影响  

Effect of different mechanical planting mode on rice yield

作　　者：张稳成 唐湘如[2] 谢俊锋[3] 梁仲维[3] 李泽华[4] 马旭[3] 齐龙[3] 刘鸿萍 

机构地区：[1]肇庆市农业科学研究所,广东肇庆526040 [2]华南农业大学农学院,广东广州510642 [3]华南农业大学工程学院,广东广州510642 [4]华南农业大学理学院,广东广州510642

出　　处：《广东农业科学》2013年第11期4-6,共3页Guangdong Agricultural Sciences

基　　金：国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(农办科[2011]25号);国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201203059-02);"十二五"农村领域国家科技计划项目(2012AA10A501-2)

摘　　要：为研究不同机械种植方式对水稻产量的影响,2010—2012年在肇庆市怀集县以人工手插为对照进行3种机械种植方式对水稻产量影响的比较试验。结果表明:与人工手插相比,机直播生育期缩短15 d左右,机械插秧种植的生育期与人工手插基本相当;2010、2011年,毯状机插、钵毯机插和机直播的产量均低于人工手插,但机直播的平均日产量高于人工手插;2012年毯状机插、钵毯机插的产量都高于人工手插,机直播的产量与人工手插基本相当,3种机械种植方式的平均日产量均高于人工手插。Artificial transplanting was used as control treatment, the effect of 3 different mechanical planting modes （carpet mechanical transplanting, bowl-carpet mechanical transplanting and mechanical direct seeding ）on rice yield was studied in Zhaoqing in 2011 to 2012. The results showed that ： compared with artificial transplanting, mechanical direct seeding shortened the growth duration by about 15 days, and the duration of mechanical transplanting was the same as artificial transplanting; compared with artificial transplanting, the rice yield of carpet mechanical transplanting, bowl-carpet mechanical transplanting and mechanical direct seeding decreased in 2010 and 2011, average daily production of carpet mechanical transplanting and bowl-carpet mechanical transplanting were lower than that of artificial transplanting, while that of mechanical direct seeding was higher than artificial transplanting in 2010 and 2011; the rice yield of carpet mechanical transplanting, bowl mechanical transplanting increased and mechanical direct seeding was the same as artificial transplanting in 2012; average daily production of mechanical planting methods were higher than that in the artificial transplanting in 2012.

关 键 词：机械化 种植方式 水稻 产量 

分 类 号：S233.71[农业科学—农业机械化工程]