检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《苏州科技学院学报(社会科学版)》2013年第3期81-87,共7页Journal of University of Science and Technology of Suzhou:Social Science
基 金:2011年国家社科基金项目"20世纪以来美国公共医保制度的演进"(11BSH001)
摘 要:医疗保健资源的理想分配标准应当是"因需制宜",但在美国,由于医疗服务和医疗保险的供应商始终推崇并坚持经济自由主义和市场化原则,因而导致了医疗资源分配在事实上往往遵循"因价制宜"的标准。过分强调价格机制在医疗保健领域中的作用,不仅导致了医疗资源在种族群体间的畸形分配,而且在一定程度上掩盖了种族不平等,造成了医疗保健领域事实上的种族不公现象。The ideal standard of distribution in .health care should be "equal care for equal needs". However, in the United States, the health care system is, in effect, organized to allocate medical care primarily by "price criteria" rather than by medical needs, due to the idea of economic liberalism and marketization advocated by medical insurers and providers. The overemphasis on the role of pricing mechanism not only causes racial disparities in the distribution sector of health care, but also justifies racial and ethnic disparities in health care and allows racial inequality to continue under cover of economic justifications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38