检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨增雷[1] 张岗[1] 王盛兴[1] 张敬悌[1] 葛文安[1] 白明[1]
机构地区:[1]西安市儿童医院泌尿外科,陕西省西安市710003
出 处:《临床小儿外科杂志》2013年第3期224-225,228,共3页Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery
摘 要:目的评价和比较Snodgrass和Onlay两种术式治疗尿道下裂的临床疗效。方法对2006年11月至2012年7月施行Snodgrass和Onlay手术的140例尿道下裂患儿的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果Snodgrass组治愈率为73.7%,尿道瘘发生率为18.4%,尿道狭窄发生率为11.8%;Onlay组治愈率为93.8%,尿道瘘发生率为6.3%,尿道狭窄发生率为1.6%。两组比较,治愈率Onlay组显著高于Snodgrass组,P〈0.05;尿道瘘及尿道狭窄发生率Onlay组显著低于Snodgrass组,P〈0.05。结论对背侧包皮丰富,尿道板发育良好,且不伴严重下弯的尿道下裂患儿,Onlay术式疗效优于Snodgrass术式。Objetive To summarize the experience of Snodgrass and Onlay technique in the treatment of hypospadias, and to compare the curative effect between the two surgical styles. Methods The curative effect of 140 patients with hypospadias treated by Snodgrass or Onlay from November 2006 to July 2012 was ret- rospectively analyzed. Results In Snodgrass group, the cure rate of patients was 73.7% , the urinary fistula rate was 18.4%, and the urethral stricture rate was 11.8% ; In Onlay group, the cure rate of patients was 93.8% ,the urinary fistula rate was 6.3%, and the urethral stricture rate was 1.6%. The cure rate of patients in Onlay group was significantly higher than that in Snodgrass group ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The Onlay technique is more suitable than Snodgrass for the hypospadias children with rich dorsal foreskin, well-developed urethral plate and not associated with serious penile bend.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.244.250