检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省江门市中心医院急诊科,广东江门529070
出 处:《中国现代医生》2013年第20期156-157,160,共3页China Modern Doctor
摘 要:目的探讨采用Wells量表结合血浆D-二聚体检测对急性肺栓塞的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析我院疑似APE患者189例,分别以Wells量表、D-二聚体检测及两者结合对急性肺栓塞做出诊断,分析各组APE诊断率。结果进行CTPA检查后诊断APE 74例。D-二聚体、Wells量表、二者结合诊断APE灵敏度分别为91.9%、89.2%、97.3%,三组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组诊断APE的阴性预测值分别为91.6%、90.0%、95.4%,三组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。二者结合阳性似然比2.11,阴性似然比0.05。结论 D-二聚体结合Wells量表操作简单,对APE早期筛选具有价值,能更准确地预测APE的发病风险,当二者均为阴性时,排除疑似APE更加安全有效。Objective To study the value of Wells score assessment combined with simplified rapid plasma D-dimer assay for acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Methods Clinical data of 189 suspected cases of acute pulmonary em- bolism were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical diagnosis for APE of the patients were made based on their probability Wells score, plasma D-dimer and a combination of Wells score. Analyze APE diagnosis rate of each group. Results The results showed 74 cases were diagnosed as APE by the CTPA. Sensitivity of D-dimer, Wells score and Wells score combinative with D-direct to diagnose APE was 91.9%, 89.2% and 97.3%, which had significant difference a mong the three groups (P 〈 0.05). Negative predictive value of three groups to diagnose APE were 91.6%, 90.% and 95.4%, which had significant difference among the three groups (P 〈 0.05). Likelihood ratio for both positive test re- sults of 2.11 and a likelihood ratio for both negative test results of 0.05. Conclusion As a routine diagnosis test, D- dimer combined with Wells score assessment play a screening role in early diagnosis for APE, D-dimer testing com- bined with Wells score can more accurately predict the risk of APE, the rate of rulling out suspected APE is more safe and effective when they are negative.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69