著作人格权的历史与命运  

The History and Destiny of the Moral Right

作　　者：吴雨辉[1] 徐瑄[1] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学知识产权与法治研究中心,广州510632

出　　处：《北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第4期149-157,共9页Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金(08@ZH003)成果

摘　　要：在多大程度上承认并保护作者的著作人格权,使其成为法律上的"权利",大陆法系国家和英美法系国家的态度各不相同。大陆法系国家多采用明文保护著作人格权。而英美多在司法实践中,采取合同法和商标法间接保护作者的著作人格权权益。网络时代诸多新创作形式的涌现,使得著作人格权要不要保护、需要多强的保护程度问题更加突出。著作人格权作为法律权利的命运在两大法系存在巨大文化差异的理解和博弈中,前途未卜。各国乃至国际社会的著作权法立法面临艰难的选择。Civil law countries and common law countries take different attitudes towards the recognition and protection of the moral right. Civil law countries often protect the moral right with statute law, while common law countries don＇ t recognize the moral right as a part of the copyright. The latter often protect an author＇ s moral right indirectly with contract law and trademark law. With the emergence of many new modes of creation in the Internet age, the following problems have become more serious： Should the moral right be protected？ To what extent should the moral right be protected？ Due to the diverse understanding of these two legal systems which have huge cultural differences, and also due to their contention, the destiny of the moral right remains uncertain. It＇ s a difficult choice for each country and international community in their copyright law legislation.

关 键 词：著作人格权 保护强度 立法选择 历史命运 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]