机构地区:[1]石河子大学农学院资源与环境科学系,石河子832003
出 处:《农业工程学报》2013年第14期130-138,共9页Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基 金:国家973计划项目(2009CB825101-5);国家自然科学基金资助项目(30960210)
摘 要:通过田间试验研究了不同灌溉水盐度和灌溉量对棉花水氮利用效率的影响。试验设置三种灌溉水盐度(电导率EC):0.35(淡水)、4.61(微咸水)和8.04dS/m(咸水),分别以FW、BW和SW表示;两个灌溉量405和540mm,分别以I405、I540表示。结果表明微咸水灌溉棉花干物质质量最高,其次是淡水灌溉,咸水灌溉最低。咸水灌溉棉花的氮素吸收量、产量显著降低,但微咸水与淡水灌溉差异不显著。农田蒸散量随灌溉水量的增加而增加,随灌溉水盐度的增加而降低。微咸水灌溉对滴灌棉田蒸散量和水分生产率影响不大,但咸水灌溉导致蒸散量和水分生产率显著降低。15N同位素标记试验结果表明,三种灌溉水盐度下,高灌量处理(540mm)较低灌量处理(405mm)棉花15N回收率平均增加7.51%,土壤15N回收率降低13.20%,15N淋洗损失率增加29.47%。不同灌溉水盐度处理棉花15N回收率为47.02%~59.86%,微咸水灌溉棉花15N回收率与淡水灌溉差异不大,但咸水灌溉棉花15N回收率较淡水和微咸水灌溉分别降低了10.17%和15.23%。不同灌溉水盐度对土壤15N残留率的影响较小,为16.75%~22.41%。15N的淋洗损失率为1.56%~4.71%,表现为随灌溉水盐度的增加而显著增加,咸水和微咸水灌溉15N淋洗损失率平均较淡水灌溉分别增加了80.53%和136.00%。上述结果说明适宜盐度和灌溉量的微咸水滴灌对棉花生长、产量以及水氮利用率影响不大,但高盐度咸水灌溉会导致棉花减产,水氮利用率显著降低。滴灌条件下,氮素的淋洗损失也是氮肥损失的重要途径,尤其是咸水和微咸水灌溉会加剧氮肥的淋洗损失风险。因此,咸水微咸水灌溉条件下减少氮肥的淋洗损失是提高氮肥利用率的重要方面。The scarcity of fresh water in arid regions makes saline water a valuable alternative water source for irrigation. In this study, field experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of saline water irrigation on growth, yield and water use efficiency of cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.), as well as plant and soil 15N recovery. Three irrigation water salinity levels were designed as 0.35, 4.61 and 8.04 dS/m, representing fresh water (FW), brackish water (BW), and saline water (SW), respectively. Two irrigation amounts were set as 405 mm (I405) and 540 mm (I540) under each irrigation water salinity treatment. Overall, the dry matter weight, N uptake, and yield of cotton increased with irrigation amount increasing from 405 mm to 540 ram, but there were differences under different water salinity treatments. The highest dry matter weight of cotton was found under the BW treatment, which was 9.6% and 20.2% higher than that under the FW and SW treatments, respectively. Plant N uptake and yield under SW treatment was significantly lower than that under FW treatments, but there were no significant difference between the BW and FW treatments. The ET of cotton field increased with irrigation amount increased, but decreased with water salinity increasing from 0.35 dS/mto 4.61 dS/m, and to 8.04 dS/m. BW had the similar ET with FW, but ET was significantly reduced under SW treatment. The water productivity of cotton and the water productivity of irrigation under different treatments ranged from 0.70 to 1.02 kg/m3 and from 0.79 to 1.16 kg/m3, respectively. The water productivity of cotton and the water productivity of irrigation were significantly higher in BW and FW than the SW treatment. The result of 15N Isotopes tracer experiment showed that the plant 15N recovery under the I540 treatments was on average 7.51% higher than that under I405 treatments. The soil 15N recovery was reduced with 13.20% and 15N leachingpercentage was increased with 29.47% when irrigation amount increasing from 405
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...