知识产权保护宽度、企业研发投资与社会福利  被引量:7

The protection scope of intellectual property right,enterprise R&D investment,and social welfare

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:赵旭梅[1] 

机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学,北京100029

出  处:《科研管理》2013年第7期87-92,共6页Science Research Management

基  金:北京市社科基金项目(12JGB072);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(11YJC790298)

摘  要:知识产权保护宽度是激励创新企业开展研发投资的主要政策工具,它通过影响知识产权的盈利能力与获取成本,作用于研发企业和受让企业之间的知识产权交易。构建一个两企业、能力非对称的多阶段博弈模型,进行一般均衡分析,结果表明:只有在研发企业的投资支出达到一定规模后,增加保护宽度,才能提高企业收益,激励企业增加研发投资。在既定研发投资下,保护宽度的边际增加将提高技术转让成本,降低受让企业收益和社会福利水平;这一负面效果只有在实现研发投资扩张效应后,才能减缓。因此在增加保护宽度的同时,需要引入辅助措施,如对企业的研发投资采取税收优惠政策、促进企业间知识产权交易等加以协调。The protection scope of IPR is the primary policy tool for stimulating innovative enterprises to invest in R&D. It exerts an influence on the IPR transaction between transferor and transferee enterprises by affecting the acquisition cost and profitability of IPR. A multi - stage game model of two enterprises with asymmetrical abilities is built and general balanced analysis is con- ducted. Results show that expanding protection scope of IPR is able to raise enterprise income and stimulate enterprises to invest more on R&D only if the initial R&D investment reaches at a certain scale. Under the established R&D investment, expanding IPR protection scope margin would increase the cost of technology transfer, boosting profit for the transferor, meanwhile decrea- sing profit for the transferee and bringing the negative influence on social welfare. The negative side effect would be mitigated only alter the distensible effect of R&D investment is achieved. Therefore, while expanding the protection scope of IPR, the auxiliary measures, such as preferential taxation policy for enterprise R&D investment and IPR trade promotion among enterprises, should also be introduced.

关 键 词:知识产权保护宽度 知识产权盈利 研发投资支出 企业预期收益 总社会福利水平 

分 类 号:F204[经济管理—国民经济]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象