论朝鲜通信使眼中的日本衣冠服饰礼俗——以《海行总载》记录为例  

On Japanese Etiquette and Custom of Headdress Garments and Accessories in the Eyes of Korean Messengers:Record of Whole Voyage as an Example

作　　者：金禹彤[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学历史文化学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第4期87-93,共7页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(12BZX034);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2012M521314)

摘　　要：朝鲜通信使在纪行文集《海行总载》中记录了日本江户时代的衣冠服饰礼俗,他们认为:日本社会根据身份不同而有大体的衣冠等级规范,但同时又普遍穿着斑斓彩衣、不戴冠巾、无靴鞋履舄、跣足而行,且衣制"不秘"、俗尚染齿,全社会无丧服法度,这些都完全不合儒家"别上下、防男女、去夷狄"的衣冠伦理;更甚者,行外交接聘之时,日本也体现不出衣冠威仪及君臣之别。朝鲜通信使从儒家礼义的角度批判了日本的衣冠礼俗,并据此认为日本人是"诡怪"、"巧伪"、"蛮夷"之民。这种因文化差异导致的主观评判体现了朝鲜通信使面对异质文化时的自我价值体认、对自身文化优越性的自信,以及因日本发动侵朝战争而产生的对日本根性文化的怀疑和不信任。In the travel note of Whole Voyage Korean messenger recorded Japanese etiquette and custom of headdress garments and accessories in Edo Period.In their eyes,on the basis of social strata Japanese people had hierarchical norm to some degree,but at the same time the Japanese people wore colorful clothes without crown towel and proper shoes,which did not fit Confucian ethics.The Korean messengers criticized them from Confucian etiquettes and customs and on this basis they thought that Japanese people were ＂strange＂,＂hypocritical＂ and ＂wild＂.

关 键 词：朝鲜通信使 日本衣冠服饰礼俗 “诡怪” “巧伪” “蛮夷” 《海行总载》 

分 类 号：K313.36[历史地理—历史学]