试论《中日修好条规》的不平等性  

On the Inequality about Sino-Japanese Treaty of 1871

作　　者：张岩[1] 黄定天[2] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学农学部公共教学中心马列教研室,吉林长春130062 [2]吉林大学东北亚研究院,吉林长春130062

出　　处：《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第4期99-102,共4页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大研究项目(05JJDGJW006)

摘　　要：学术界对于1871年《中日修好条规》是否平等的问题存有争议,其根源在于采用了国际关系史和国际法两种不同的标准。该约的签订程序按国际法的标准是平等的,但其内容按国际法的标准则存在着领事裁判权等不平等的方面。其签订目的和效果按国际关系史的标准看,是日本用修约的方式为日后"合法"入侵朝鲜所做的准备。Academia has a disputed topic whether equal or not about Sino-Japan Treaty of 1871.Its root lies in people according to the two different standards,they are history of international relations and international law.The program about signing the treaty,according to the standards of international law,it is equal.But the content according to the standards of international law,it includes consular jurisdiction and other aspects of inequality.Its signing purpose and effect according to the standards of the international relations,they are Japanese preparation for ＂legitimate＂ invasion of Korea in the future.

关 键 词：《中日修好条规》 条约 性质 中日关系 

分 类 号：K256[历史地理—历史学]