检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈靖[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学社会学系
出 处:《中国农村观察》2013年第4期14-21,94,共8页China Rural Survey
摘 要:"合村并居"是在城镇化背景下,由国家土地政策、新农村建设与社区发展三种政策力量共同塑造的社会改造项目,大多数地方政府乐于推动"合村并居"以实现村庄发展。"资本进村"推动的"合村并居"将带来村社利益格局的剧烈变动,对乡村社会稳定和社区治理造成危害。而以"村社理性"为原则的"合村并居"能够使村社共同体的利益最大化地得以保持,使"合村并居"的发展成果在社区内实现最大化、发展的社会成本实现最小化,凸显"合村并居"的积极意义。Under the background of urbanization,the project of 'village mergesing' was shaped by the comprehensive function of three policies:the national land policy,the policy of new rural reconstruction and community development.Most local governments are willing to promote the project of 'village mergesing' to achieve the effect of community development.The project of 'village mergesing' which was promoted by 'capital inflow in village' have shaken the benefits' structure of the community,caused damage to rural social stability and community governance.While guided by the principle of 'rural community rationality',it can highlight the positive significance of the project of 'village mergesing',which maximized the development efforts in local community and minimized social costs of development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145