检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医药卫生管理学院,武汉430030 [2]石河子大学医学院,新疆石河子832002 [3]河北省衡水市卫生局,河北衡水053000
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2013年第7期78-80,共3页Chinese Health Economics
摘 要:目的:评价新疆生产建设兵团14家师级医院的效率。方法:采用DEA的CCR模型和BCC模型计算新疆生产建设兵团的整体效率、纯技术效率和规模效率,再采用超效率模型计算14家兵团师级医院的超效率值及其排名。结果:在总体模式中,有28.6%的医院处于固定规模报酬状态,在服务模式中仅有14.3%的医院处于固定规模报酬状态,两种模式中均有57.1%的医院处于规模报酬递减阶段。结论:从两个模型的结果看,相对于规模效率,纯技术效率要有更大的提升空间,医院应进一步提高医疗技术水平,避免盲目扩张,尽量减少不必要的投入,加强内部精细化管理,提高医院整体运行效率。Objective: To evaluate the operational efficiency of the division-level hospitals of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps. Methods: Use DEA's CCR model and BCC model to calculate the overall efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, and use super-efficiency model to calculate efficiency ranking of the division- level hospitals. Results: In the total pattern, there were 28.6% of the agricultural division hospitals at the stage of constant returns scale; in the medical service model, there were only 14.3% hospitals at that stage. Conclusion: From the results of two models, the technical efficiency has more room for improvement, compared with efficiency scale. The hospital needs to improve the level of health care technique, avoid blind expansion, minimize unnecessary input, strengthen internal meticulous management, and improve the overall operating efficiency of the hospital.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28