检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第4期134-139,共6页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
基 金:2011年教育部人文社会科学研究项目:中国民间对日索赔中的国际法问题研究--以重庆大轰炸受害者索赔为典型的实证分析(11YJA820031)
摘 要:中国民间对日索赔诉讼已历经18个春秋,诉讼案达31件,除4例和解外,终审无一胜诉。①对日民间诉讼已成为左右中日关系走向的一个不容忽视的重要方面,运用得当不但可以维护我国战争受害者及其遗族的合法权益,又能一定程度上遏制日本军国主义右倾化趋势。日本法院晚近判决中,驳回我国民间索赔的主要理由有二:一是受害者个人无诉权;二是"国家无答责"。实际上,以上二者均背离了国际法理。Chinese civil claims to Japan litigation has gone through 18 years, with total of 31 lawsuits, without a win except for 4 reconciliation cases. Chinese civil claims to Japan litigation has become one of the important aspects about the trend of Sino-Japanese relations, which not only can safeguard our legiti- mate rights and interests of war victims and survivors but also can contain the Japanese militarism rightist trend to some extent if used properly. There were two main reasons rejected our country civil claims in Ja- pan court judgment, one is individual victims is no right of appeal, the other is "A country without a re- sponsibility". On the analysis of above reasons we know that the above two deviates from the principles of international law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3