论渎职犯罪中的“徇私舞弊”  

On the Irregularities for Favoritism in Malfeasance Crime

作　　者：吴飞飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]国家检察官学院科研部,北京102206

出　　处：《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第4期49-55,共7页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）

基　　金：中国法学会部级法学研究课题"犯罪形态视域下的身份犯及其展开"(CLS2011D48)阶段性成果

摘　　要：将徇私舞弊理解为犯罪动机较为符合刑法规定与现实情况。受贿后滥用职权的应当数罪并罚,这取决于对受贿罪中"为他人谋利益"要件的准确认识和定位,以及刑法中牵连犯理论的深入分析。在受贿后滥用职权的情形下,如果对两罪进行并罚得到的宣告刑可能轻于滥用职权罪的徇私舞弊加重情节的,对犯罪嫌疑人应当按照徇私舞弊加重法定刑判处。According to Criminal Law and the current situation, irregularities for favoritism is better to be interpreted as criminal motive. Based on the accurate understanding of ＂securing interests for others＂ in bribery crime and deep analysis in implicated offender theory, one should be imposed concurrent punishment if he abuses authority after bribery. However, if the sentence of penalty resulted by concurrent punishment is lighter than the penalty caused by the crime of abuse authority with aggravating circumstances of irregularities for favoritism, one should be convicted of malfeasance crime with aggravated statutory punishment.

关 键 词：徇私舞弊 “为他人谋利益” 牵连犯 数罪并罚 加重法定刑 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]