检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙惠杰[1] 李响[1] 赵晓甦[1] 程秀丽[1]
机构地区:[1]吉林大学第一医院干部病房,中国长春130021
出 处:《国际老年医学杂志》2013年第4期174-176,共3页International Journal of Geriatrics
摘 要:目的:探索品管圈活动支持对改善老年失智患者照护质量的效果评价。方法:以2010年10月至2012年10月在我院干部病房住院的老年失智患者共110例为研究对象,其中2010年10月至2011年10月的50例仅给予常规护理,未给予“品管圈”活动支持为对照组,2011年11月至2012年10月的60例给予品管圈活动支持为试验组。比较两个组患者基本参数差异和住院期间不良事件发生率、家属对照护者照护的满意度。结果:两组患者基本参数差异无统计学意义,试验组不良事件发生率低于对照组(P〈0.01),家属对照护的满意度高于对照组(P〈0.01)。结论:开展“老年失智患者照护质量”为主题的品管圈活动,为老年失智患者照护提供了系统性的护理知识、操作技能和情感支持,对老年失智患者的照护质量起到了积极、有效的作用。OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of quality control circle activity support in the improvement of the quality the care among the patients with senile dementia. METHODS: 110 patients suffering from senile dementia were enrolled. 50 cases received routine nursing only and 60 cases were treated by quality control circle activity support. In two groups of patients fundamental parame- ters difference, the adverse events of experimental group and the satisfaction of patients' family members were compared. RESULTS. The adverse events happened in experimental group were lower than in the control group ( P 〈 0.01 ). The satisfaction of the family members in experimental group was higher than that in control group ( P 〈 0. 01 ). There were no statistically difference in the fundamental parameters between two groups. CONCLUSION: Quality control circle activities can provide systemic nursing knowledge, operating skills and emotional support. And it can improve quality of care among patients with senile dementia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31