检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王林[1]
出 处:《周口师范学院学报》2013年第4期82-85,共4页Journal of Zhoukou Normal University
基 金:2012年度河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目"权力依法行使的监督与制约机制研究"(2012-GH-191)的阶段性成果
摘 要:从行政复议机关对行政规范合法性审查的必要性、法律依据、方式,以及该制度在理论与实践中存在的问题,完善这一制度可行的解决方案等几个方面探讨行政复议中的行政规范审查权制度,认为应该扩大复议审查范围,完善复议审查方式,提高行政复议审查标准,明确规定审查结果的形式和效力,切实保护行政相对人的合法权益。This paper focuses on the topic of administrative review of the normative documents, that is, the right about the legal review of the normative documents of the organs of administrative review. Firstly, this paper will analyze the necessity of the administrative review of the normative documents, including the problems of the normative documents and four reasons to pursue this system. Secondly, the paper will cite the legal basis and the embodiment for the implement of this system,including three items of Administrative Review Law. Thirdly, the paper will analyze some abnormal problems which have appeared during the system's operation. It includes the narrow scope of the review, the exclusion of the justifiable review of the normative documents,the uncertainty of its form and effectiveness and the administrative censorship as the final remedy. Finally, some feasible solutions will be put forward, which include .. to en- large the scope of administrative review of the normative documents, to establish the system of direct incidental censorship, the system of direct independent censorship and the system of positive independent censorship, to include the justifiable review of the normative documents, to make the form and effectiveness of administrative review more clearly and to make the judicial censorship as the final remedy.
分 类 号:D912.112[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249