我国地方政府公共服务效率评价及其影响因素分析  

On Delivery Efficiencies of Local Government Basic Public Services and Its Influencing Factors

作　　者：孙德梅 王正沛[1] 孙莹莹[1] 

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150001

出　　处：《华东经济管理》2013年第8期142-149,共8页East China Economic Management

基　　金：黑龙江省教育厅人文社科项目(12534031);黑龙江省社科基金项目(11D091);黑龙江省科技攻关项目(GZ11D211)

摘　　要：以2000-2011年31个省级政府公共服务投入产出数据作为支撑,运用非径向SBM-DEA模型,测度我国省级政府公共服务效率,并实证研究了影响我国省级政府公共服务效率的主要因素,研究结果表明:①北京、山东、河南、山西4个省市政府公共服务效率为1,江西、辽宁、安徽等17个省市政府公共服务效率低于0.9,其中云南、内蒙古、青海、新疆、西藏五个地区政府公共服务效率更低于0.5;东部地区主要省份政府公共服务效率最高,中部地区略低,西部地区排名最低;相比较而言,西南、西北地区主要省份政府公共服务效率较低,中部和东南沿海地区大部分省份政府公共服务效率较高。②人口数量、人均GDP以及FDI对政府公共服务效率产生正向作用;产业结构、地区客运量对政府公共服务效率有较大影响,分别对其产生正向和负向作用。This paper is based on the China＇s 31 provincial government put,lie service input and oulput data in 2000-2010, uses the non-radial SBM model, measures the public service efficiency of China＇ s provincial government and analyzes the factors that influence China＇s provincial government public service efficiency with the panel data model. The results show that： （1） the public service efficiency of Beijing, Shandong and other 4 provincial government is 1, and Tibet, Qinghai, and other 3 provincial government, less than 0.5; the eastern main provincial government, the highest, and the next is the central area and the last is the western area; comparatively speaking, the public service efficiency of the main southwestern and southwest provincial government is lower, while that of most central and southeastern coastal areas is higher. （2） Population, per capita GDP and FDI have positive effect on government public service efficiency; industrial structure affects greatly positively the government public service efficiency and area volume of passenger traffic affects greatly negatively.

关 键 词：非径向SBM模型 政府公共服务效率 产业结构 人口数量 

分 类 号：F062.6[经济管理—政治经济学]