不同地形条件下青藏高原农田土壤有机碳的分布特征  

Soil organic carbon in croplands across different terrains in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:南雅芳[1] 郭胜利[1,2] 李娜娜[1] 张彦军[1] 陈爱霞 荣丽媛 刘京[1] 

机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学资源与环境学院,陕西杨凌712100 [2]中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,陕西杨凌712100 [3]河北省任丘市农业局土肥站,河北任丘062550 [4]广宗县职教中心,河北邢台054600

出  处:《植物营养与肥料学报》2013年第4期946-954,共9页Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers

基  金:中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA05050504)资助

摘  要:西北高寒地区农田土壤有机碳(SOC)储量的变化研究,可为东部农田SOC对气候和管理措施的响应提供预警信息。针对西部高原县域尺度上典型的地貌类型和土壤类型,对其耕层和剖面SOC进行了分析。结果表明,青海省乐都县农田耕层(0—20 cm)SOC的变化范围为4.38 g/kg~20.81 g/kg,均值为11.29 g/kg,且不同土壤类型上表现出黑钙土(16.15 g/kg)>栗钙土(10.53 g/kg)>灰钙土(9.50 g/kg)的趋势。地形对耕层(0—20 cm)SOC含量没有显著影响,但深层(20—100 cm)SOC因地形存在显著差异,在峁坡上,黑钙土、栗钙土和灰钙土的深层(20—100 cm)SOC分别比同种土壤类型的谷底深层土壤提高了111.5%、62.5%和66.3%。农田SOC的垂直分布也因地形存在差异,同一种土壤类型在谷底其耕层(0—20 cm)SOC含量均比深层(20—100 cm)高,峁坡上其深层(20—100 cm)比耕层(0—20 cm)高,黑钙土、栗钙土和灰钙土在谷底其耕层(0—20 cm)SOC含量分别比同一土壤类型的深层(20—100 cm)土壤提高18.7%、24.3%和153.5%,黑钙土、栗钙土和灰钙土在峁坡上其深层(20—100cm)SOC含量分别比同一土壤类型耕层(0—20 cm)提高46.9%、8.0%和1.0%。这一结果可为准确估算青藏高原农田SOC的变化提供参考。Northwest alpinecold region is an important part of China's agricultural production. Understanding soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and its influencing factors in northwest alpinecold region contributes to accurately evaluate change of national soil organic carbon storage, and also may provide early warning information on response of SOC to climate and management measures in croplands with same latitude or lowaltitude. Based on two landform types (slope and bottom) and three soil types (chernozem, kastanozem and sierozem), soil samples from seventyfive sites were collected for investigating distribution characteristics of cropland SOC contents and the relationship with terrains in Ledu county of Qinghai province. The cropland surface (0 -20 cm) SOC contents range from 4.38 g/kg to 20.81 g/kg with the average of 11.29 g/kg in Ledu county, and the SOC contents in the three soil types follow the decreasing order as: chernozem〉kastanozem〉sierozem. There are no significant differences of surface SOC contents (0-20 cm) in different terrains, however, there are significant differences in the subsoil SOC contents (20-100 cm). Compared with the three soil types in bottom, the subsoil SOC contents of the same soil type in the slope are increased by 111.5%、 62.5% and 66.3%. The SOC contents in the vertical layers have differences in different terrains. The surface SOC contents (0-20 cm) are higher than those of the subsoil (20-100 cm) in the bottom in the same soil type, and the SOC contents in the subsoil (20-100 cm) are higher than those of the surface soil in the slope in the same soil type. Compared with the subsoil (20-100 cm) SOC contents of the three soil types in the bottom, the surface (0-20 cm) SOC contents are increased by 18.7%, 24.3% and 153.5%. Compared with the surface (0-20 cm) SOC contents of the three soil types in the slope, the subsoil (20-100 cm) SOC contents are increased by 46.9%, 8.0% and 1.0%. These results are contribution to the study

关 键 词:青藏高原 农田 土壤有机碳 

分 类 号:S153.62[农业科学—土壤学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象