《米德尔马契》的悖论自由  

The Paradoxical Liberty in Middlemarch

作　　者：廖昌胤[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海外国语大学文学研究院上海200083

出　　处：《外语教学》2013年第4期84-89,共6页Foreign Language Education

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“当代英美悖论诗学的反思研究”(项目编号:10BWW016)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：《米德尔马契》丰富的悖论自由和改革出路含义在近十年研究中被有意无意地忽略。本文从阿诺德和威廉斯暗示的自由民主悖论为起点,重新审视这部小说所隐喻的悖论自由和解决悖论的改革出路。悖论式自由意味着自己的充分自由权力必然侵入他人自由领域、粗暴干涉他人的自由权力。为解决这个悖论,政治改革的终极目的,就是在不断提升每个人的自由认知水平中,建立一种平等共存的价值结构,限制任何侵入他人自由领域、干涉他人个体自由的行为,从而充分保护国家、组织和公民的真正自由。The implications of paradoxical liberty and solution to the political reform have been absent in the criticism of George Eliot in the past ten years. On the basis of the implied paradoxical liberty from Mathew Arnold and Raymond Williams, this paper revisits Middlemarch for its metaphorized paradoxical liberty and solutions to the reform. The paradoxical liberty in- dicates that one＇ s own absolute free power is inevitable invasion into others＇ civil right as offensive interference into others＇ liberty. One of the solutions to the paradox might be such an establishment of the value structure consisting of equality and co- existence in order to prevent the powers of the states, organizations and individuals from trespassing into others＇ free domain and interfering in others＇ personal freedom, thus in turn, to protect the real freedom of citizens, organizations and states.

关 键 词：悖论 自由 《米德尔马契》 

分 类 号：I561.074[文学—其他各国文学]