机构地区:[1]河北医科大学第二医院消化内科 河北省消化病实验室 [2]河北省消化病研究所,河北省石家庄市050000
出 处:《世界华人消化杂志》2013年第18期1766-1771,共6页World Chinese Journal of Digestology
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目;Nos.81200311;81170411~~
摘 要:目的:评估乙型肝炎E抗原(hepatitis be e antigen,HBeA g)阳性和阴性慢性乙型肝炎(chronic hepatitis B,CHB)患者肝组织病理存在的差异,并分析其与临床基本资料的关系.方法:病例资料来自2005-01/2012-12在河北医科大学第二医院消化内科住院并做肝脏活组织检查的CHB患者.根据乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus,HBV)血清标志物乙型肝炎表面抗原(hepatitis B surface antigen,HBsAg)和HBeAg区分HBeAg阳性和HBeAg阴性CHB患者,同时记录性别、年龄、谷丙转氨酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT)和HBV DNA病毒载量,并进行统计分析.统计学处理采用SPS13.0统计软件,计量资料采用mean±SD表示,两样本均数的比较,如为正态分布用t检验,偏态分布用Mann-Whitney检验,多组计量资料的两两比较采用ANOVA检验.相关性分析采用Pearson检验.计数资料采用2检验.结果:158例CHB患者根据血清标志物HBeAg分为HBeAg阳性组86例和HBeAg阴性组72例,两组年龄差异有统计学意义(t=-7.50,P<0.01),性别比例差异无统计学意义(2=0.10,P>0.05).HBeAg阳性组与HBeAg阴性组在肝脏纤维化分期构成比上存在统计学差异(2=20.79,P<0.01).HBeAg阳性组女性纤维化分期积分比男性低(1.48±0.69vs2.09±1.29,P<0.05).HBeAg阳性组40岁以上CHB患者炎症分级及纤维化分期积分(2.93±1.03和2.67±1.23)均高于30-40岁组(2.09±1.27和1.86±1.25)和30岁以下年龄组(2.16±0.69和1.65±0.99),有统计学意义(P<0.05).HBeAg阴性组30岁以下CHB患者纤维化分期积分(1.57±0.98)明显低于30-40岁组(2.73±1.37)和40岁以上年龄组(3.03±1.06),有统计学意义(P<0.05).在HBeAg阳性,年龄与炎症分级和纤维化分期积分均成正相关(r=0.30,0.34,P<0.01).在HBeAg阴性组,年龄与炎症分级和纤维化分期积分也均成正相关(r=0.26,0.34,P<0.05).HBeAg阳性组ALT与炎症分级和纤维化分期积分均成正相关(r=0.32、0.24,P<0.05);在HBeAg阴性组,ALT与炎症分级积分成正相关(r=0.33,P<0.01),与纤维化分期AIM: To find the differences in liver histopathology between HBeAg-positive and HBeAg -negative patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), and to analyze their relationship with clinical data. METHODS: CHB patients (n = 158) who were admitted to the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University for a liver biopsy from January2005 to December 2012 were enrolled. They were divided into an HBeAg-positive (n = 86) and an HBeAg-negative group (n = 72) based on the presence of HBeAg or not. Gender, age, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA viral load were recorded and statistically analyzed with SPSS l3.0. RESULTS: The age differed significantly between the HBeAg-positive group and HBeAgnegative group (t = -7.50, P 0.01), although there was no statistically significant difference in sex ratio between the two groups ( 2 = 0.10, P 0.05). A significant difference was noted in the constituent ratio of liver fibrosis stages between the two groups ( 2 = 20.79, P 0.01). The fibrosis stage score in HBeAg-positive women was lower than that in men (1.48 ± 0.69 vs 2.09 ± 1.29, P 0.05). For HBeAg-positive patients, both inflammation grade and fibrosis stage scores were significantly higher in the 40 years age group than in the 30-40 years age group and 30 years age group (2.93 ± 1.03 vs 2.09 ± 1.27, 2.16 ± 0.69; 2.67 ± 1.23 vs 1.86 ± 1.25, 1.65 ± 0.99, all P 0.05). For HBeAg-negative patients, fibrosis stage score was significantly lower in the 30 years age group than in the 30-40 years age group and 40 years age group (1.57 ± 0.98 vs 2.73 ± 1.37, 3.03 ± 1.06, both P 0.05). In the HBeAgpositive group, there was a positive correlation between age and inflammation grade or fibrosis stage score (r = 0.30, 0.34, both P 0.01). In the HBeAg-negative group, there was also a positive correlation between age and inflammation grade or fibrosis stage score (r = 0.26, 0.34, both P 0.05). In the HBeAg-positive group, ALT levels were positively correlated with inflammati
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...